{"id":8915,"date":"2024-06-03T13:03:51","date_gmt":"2024-06-03T17:03:51","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/tcn.tidbits.com\/?p=10481"},"modified":"2024-06-03T19:36:25","modified_gmt":"2024-06-03T23:36:25","slug":"sorry-apple-isnt-going-to-update-the-27-inch-imac-with-apple-silicon","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.macworks.com\/blog\/sorry-apple-isnt-going-to-update-the-27-inch-imac-with-apple-silicon\/","title":{"rendered":"Sorry, Apple Isn\u2019t Going to Update the 27-inch iMac with Apple Silicon"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Are you a 27-inch iMac owner wondering when Apple will release a new model with speedy Apple silicon? We hate to be the bearer of bad news, but the answer seems to be an unequivocal \u201cNever.\u201d Late last year, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.theverge.com\/2023\/11\/6\/23947196\/apple-no-27-inch-apple-silicon-imac\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Apple confirmed to The Verge<\/a> that it would not be making an Apple silicon version of the 27-inch iMac. Technically, that leaves open the possibility of a 32-inch iMac, for instance, but that feels like wishful thinking given the $5000 cost of Apple\u2019s 32-inch <a href=\"https:\/\/www.apple.com\/pro-display-xdr\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Pro Display XDR<\/a>. How did we get here, and where should 27-inch iMac owners look next?<\/p>\n<p>Apple introduced the 27-inch iMac with 5K Retina display in 2014 and updated it several times before discontinuing it in 2022. It was hugely popular due to its large, gorgeous screen and a price that made the guts of the Mac seem cheap when paired with such a nice screen. An 8-year run isn\u2019t bad, but once Apple introduced the powerful <a href=\"https:\/\/www.apple.com\/mac-studio\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Mac Studio<\/a> and the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.apple.com\/studio-display\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">27-inch Studio Display<\/a> (also a 5K Retina display), the company felt there was no room for the 27-inch iMac in the lineup.<\/p>\n<p>Apple isn\u2019t necessarily wrong. One of the reasons 27-inch iMac owners are so attached to their Macs is that they can\u2019t upgrade the computer and keep using that lovely screen, which remains one of the best available. <a href=\"https:\/\/support.apple.com\/en-us\/105126\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Target Display Mode<\/a> (which lets you use some much older iMacs as an external display for another Mac) never supported that model of iMac, and although the $80 <a href=\"https:\/\/astropad.com\/product\/lunadisplay\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Luna Display<\/a> dongle does let you use a 27-inch iMac as a screen for another Mac, <a href=\"https:\/\/tidbits.com\/2022\/03\/16\/luna-display-turns-a-27-inch-imac-into-a-5k-display\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">its tradeoffs may be hard to accept<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>In the new world order, an Apple silicon Mac paired with a Studio Display provides a fast, capable Mac you can swap for a newer one when necessary and an extremely nice display you can use across multiple Macs. It\u2019s not uncommon for an external display to last a decade or more, whereas many businesses upgrade their Macs every 3 to 5 years. A Studio Display could easily outlast two or three Macs.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cBut, but, but,\u201d we can hear you spluttering, \u201cwhat about the 24-inch iMac with Apple silicon?\u201d It may seem odd for Apple to drop the 27-inch model but keep a smaller iMac around. The reason is that the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.apple.com\/imac\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">24-inch iMac<\/a> is meant to be a low-cost Mac that doesn\u2019t skimp on display quality. It has a 4.5K Retina display that\u2019s just a little smaller than the 27-inch iMac\u2019s 5K Retina display while matching its quality. (Those numbers refer to the number of horizontal pixels on the screen\u20144,480 or 5,120\u2014although the actual resolutions nearly everyone uses are half that to get crisp text at a readable size.) A <a href=\"https:\/\/www.apple.com\/mac-mini\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Mac mini<\/a> paired with an inexpensive external display would be cheaper than a 24-inch iMac, but you would have trouble getting a comparably good display for so little. The 24-inch iMac is perfect for a receptionist\u2019s desk or a family\u2019s kitchen computer, and its M3 chip will seriously outperform the Intel chips in the now-discontinued 27-inch iMac.<\/p>\n<p>So, let\u2019s assume you\u2019ve been holding onto your 27-inch iMac, but it\u2019s finally time to move on. The calculus of what to buy has changed due to the excellent performance of the Apple silicon Macs, even on the low end, and the existence of the Studio Display. Here\u2019s what we recommend for different needs:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><b>You\u2019re on a very limited budget:<\/b> Buy a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.apple.com\/imac\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">24-inch iMac<\/a>. The screen isn\u2019t quite as large, but the price\/performance ratio is hard to beat for such a nice screen. The lowest-end model has fewer USB ports, which might be annoying.<\/li>\n<li><b>You want a basic desktop Mac with a Retina screen:<\/b> Choose between a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.apple.com\/mac-mini\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Mac mini<\/a> paired with a Studio Display or a 24-inch iMac, which is comparable to the low-end Mac mini. For higher performance needs, go for the Mac mini with an M2 Pro.<\/li>\n<li><b>You want portability, too:<\/b> The Studio Display works well with a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.apple.com\/macbook-air\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">MacBook Air<\/a> (13-inch or 15-inch) for a budget solution or a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.apple.com\/macbook-pro\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">MacBook Pro<\/a> (14-inch or 16-inch) for a high-performance option. Using two screens also increases productivity.<\/li>\n<li><b>You\u2019re willing to pay more for performance:<\/b> Things get interesting here because you can use a Studio Display with a Mac mini with M2 Pro, a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.apple.com\/mac-studio\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Mac Studio<\/a> with M2 Max, or a MacBook Pro with either M3 Pro or M3 Max. The MacBook Pro options are the most expensive but offer portability and a second screen.<\/li>\n<li><b>You want the ultimate performance:<\/b> Pair a Studio Display with a Mac Studio or a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.apple.com\/mac-pro\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Mac Pro<\/a>, both of which come with the M2 Ultra. The choice comes down to expandability: the Mac Pro offers PCIe slots and more ports.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Right now, the M-series chips are a little confusing. The original M1 is available only in an inexpensive <a href=\"https:\/\/www.walmart.com\/ip\/Apple-MacBook-Air-13-3-inch-Laptop-Silver-M1-Chip-8GB-RAM-256GB-storage\/609040889\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">13-inch MacBook Air model sold exclusively through Walmart<\/a>. The previous MacBook Air (13-inch only), Mac mini, Mac Studio, and Mac Pro all use variants of the M2, whereas the newer MacBook Air and MacBook Pro models sport M3 variants. Until recently, we expected Apple to standardize the rest of the line on the M3, but then the iPad Pro came out with an M4 because of yield issues with the M3 fabrication process.<\/p>\n<p>It now seems probable that some models will skip the M3 entirely in favor of the M4, but don\u2019t get too caught up in the latest and greatest. There\u2019s more performance to be gained in the Pro, Max, and Ultra versions of the chips than in the next generation, so for now, the M2 Ultra remains the fastest chip for most processor-intensive tasks.<\/p>\n<p>Regardless of what Mac and display combination best meets your needs, you\u2019ll enjoy vastly better performance than was available with the 27-inch iMac, and the Studio Display is every inch as good a monitor. And maybe you can sell your 27-inch iMac on eBay.<\/p>\n<p>(Featured image by Adam Engst)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Are you a 27-inch iMac owner wondering when Apple will release a new model with speedy Apple silicon? We hate to be the bearer of bad news, but the answer seems to be an unequivocal \u201cNever.\u201d Late last year, Apple confirmed to The Verge that it would not be making an Apple silicon version of [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":8916,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[9,69,106,485,609,112,486,59,185],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-8915","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-apple","category-apple-consulting-ct","category-apple-support-ct","category-imac","category-mac-mini","category-mac-support-ct","category-macbook-air","category-macbook-pro","category-mactech"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.macworks.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8915","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.macworks.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.macworks.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.macworks.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.macworks.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8915"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.macworks.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8915\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":8921,"href":"https:\/\/www.macworks.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8915\/revisions\/8921"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.macworks.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/8916"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.macworks.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8915"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.macworks.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8915"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.macworks.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8915"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}